The country wants anyone to lead us out of this downturn. I reckon his dog might do a better job of it though.
The country wants anyone to lead us out of this downturn. I reckon his dog might do a better job of it though.His mantra is 'I will not call a General Election, the country wants me to lead them out of this downturn'.
I think he's confused 'the country wants me...' with 'during a recent solvent huffing binge, my dog said he wants me...'
^^^^QFT!!Me either. Arrogent twat can shove off. A textbook case of how far removed from relatity many of these folk are.
His mantra is 'I will not call a General Election, the country wants me to lead them out of this downturn'.
I think he's confused 'the country wants me...' with 'during a recent solvent huffing binge, my dog said he wants me...'
I just don't want history to be able to record him as 'the hapless wanker that allowed the country to slide into the bottomless pit of failure for eternity'.He's a poisonous cunt, history will judge him as a hapless wanker.
Too right. Hopefully noone will have forgotten that Brown what stood up at the helm of a ship that only had the tips of its masts still above water. I just think it's revolting to watch such a senior public figure cling on to the job simply because he was denied it for so long-ignoring absolutely everything going on around him.Tony and Gordon create huge mess, Tony hands Gordon shitty stick
The End.
Its a mini adventure.
Gordon the Gopher truly is Bliar's Jim Callaghan.Tony and Gordon create huge mess, Tony hands Gordon shitty stick
The End.
Its a mini adventure.
David Cameron.So who has done better at dealing with the problem caused by the Reagan/Thatcher deregulation of the Banking sector?
And who should I vote for at the next election who will be significantly more capable?
Bit of short memory syndrome going on here I think.
I'd still go for Gordon Brown's dog in preference.David Cameron.
Perhaps you should look a little further back still and see what state the place was in when Thatcher's administration took over.So who has done better at dealing with the problem caused by the Reagan/Thatcher deregulation of the Banking sector?
And who should I vote for at the next election who will be significantly more capable?
Bit of short memory syndrome going on here I think.
What we need is a new Millenium Dome. We've lost interest in the old one.Perhaps you should look a little further back still and see what state the place was in when Thatcher's administration took over.
'New' Labour were quite happy to ride the enormously successful wave that the deregualtion of the banking industry created. They had over 10 years to change things, to introduce regualtion to the industry which may have mitigated the crash.
But times were good, they looked good, they had billions to blow on stupid ill thought out policies and job creation quangos. Now once again they'll leave a catastrophic mess for someone else to deal with.
No, but honestly....who do you think would do a better job? :lol::lol:David Cameron.
Perhaps its time we worked out a system where the 600 odd MP's sat in Westminster tried working together, not in self serving factions. They could spend their time actually thinking things through instead of arguing about who's claimed 50p to feed the dogs and who's had a wank on company money.What we need is a new Millenium Dome. We've lost interest in the old one.
We'd be naive to ignore that there's a repetitive cycle regardless of which party is in gov't. Might as well let the Cons have it back for a couple decades-be the same.
To clarify, you think Brown should stay? Please outline your reasoning.No, but honestly....who do you think would do a better job? :lol::lol:
Cameron is another sound bite Politician, what he says may sound ok, but it really doesn't ammount to very much.
And he has no policies that I can make out, at least none that he sticks to for very long.
He might very well be taking 'decisive' action over MP's expenses, but as a large number of them where independently wealthy anyway they where always out for what they could get rather than what they needed.
Yeah, far better not to have people in employment John.Perhaps you should look a little further back still and see what state the place was in when Thatcher's administration took over.
'New' Labour were quite happy to ride the enormously successful wave that the deregualtion of the banking industry created. They had over 10 years to change things, to introduce regualtion to the industry which may have mitigated the crash.
But times were good, they looked good, they had billions to blow on stupid ill thought out policies and job creation quangos. Now once again they'll leave a catastrophic mess for someone else to deal with.
I don't think any of them are fit to lead, and that the two party system is moribund and far too focused on the minutae of their various positions rather than what is best for the country.To clarify, you think Brown should stay? Please outline your reasoning.