As many people are aware, I believe that revolutionary change is required. But even accepting the current structure, I am still ready to march the 42 miles from Great Baddow, the starting point, and on June 12th, the day in history of of the peasants revolt, to Westminster to demand an election. Can't get the rabble roused to come with me though...
I believe that within the current Parliamentary structure, there is still room for radical constitutional reform.
I would dispense with the current electoral structure, in favour of elections staggered throughout the term of office- perhaps annual. I would reduce the number of MPs to around half by changing constituency boundaries, so this would involve maybe 75-80 constituency (I'll use the term 'by-elections') each year. I would however elect both an MP, and a Constituency Mayor to deal with 'local issues', and make representations, be the 'conduit' for the MP to raise those local issues in the National Parliament.
The Leader of the House would be considerably more 'high profile' a post. (Apart from anything else, I would have expected to hear a lot more about recent issues from Harriet Harman, and a lot less from Gordon Brown, specifically because of each of their actual 'roles'.)
I would want the MPs thus elected to go about updating the system, Consigning roles such as Lord Privy Seal, and First Lord Of The Treasury, to history where they belong.
I would eventually massively reduce the parliamentary power of the party system altogether. For example, whatever an MPs party affiliation, I would have them in office as de jure independents. No whips, only free votes.