Joined
·
11,068 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong people, but isn't this another case of 'buyer not checking goods until much later down the line'........It's so much harder to argue months later that there is a defect or shortfall (as per other thread(s) on here this week).
Heritage's viewpoint (as explained by o/p) isn't exactly going to win them any sympathy.....but we haven't heard their side yet!
Maybe they get so much of this going on they might just be taking a harder line as they seem to have satisfied plenty of people who have raised issues, in good time, so they can't be all bad eh?
Isn't it about time customers took some responsibility for the money they spend?? After all he did lash out hundreds of pounds and not even looked at what he had bought
Would anyone do that in any other scenario?
I'm sure I'll get kicked all around this thread for putting the other view point....but what the hell I think it has to be said.
Heritage's viewpoint (as explained by o/p) isn't exactly going to win them any sympathy.....but we haven't heard their side yet!
Maybe they get so much of this going on they might just be taking a harder line as they seem to have satisfied plenty of people who have raised issues, in good time, so they can't be all bad eh?
Isn't it about time customers took some responsibility for the money they spend?? After all he did lash out hundreds of pounds and not even looked at what he had bought
I'm sure I'll get kicked all around this thread for putting the other view point....but what the hell I think it has to be said.