[cleedubber]

Due to recent occurances do we think its maybe time to lose the tags ??
Unfortunately they are not being used in the nature that they were most definately intended

Yes.... they stay

No..... they go

 

[Brian Burrows]

Due to recent occurances do we think its maybe time to lose the tags ??
Unfortunately they are not being used in the nature that they were most definately intended

Yes.... they stay

No..... they go

You're not thinking rationally

Knee-jerk reactions are NEVER right

That's what got us Gordon Brown

 

[cleedubber]

You're not thinking rationally

Knee-jerk reactions are NEVER right

That's what got us Gordon Brown

Yes maybe you're right....cant help emotions running a bit high at the mo.....

 

[Kafer_meister]

I voted wrong, knock the 'no's down one

 

[JustinOval]

Tags, threads, posts, advice, people you meet - all the same, you can ignore them if you choose.

 

[Volkspirate Jim]

could they be hidden for certain users who would find them overly offencive or taken away from people who abuse them?

Just an Idea

 

[DarrenW]

Due to recent occurances do we think its maybe time to lose the tags ??

No.

Unfortunately they are not being used in the nature that they were most definately intended

Yes they are. Look around the whole site and see.

 

[bigbadbugga]

not sure it will make a difference, I think tags played a small part in tonights proceedings. Who is to say the same thing would not have happened without them,

theres plenty of other ways to hurl abuse at someone.

 

[Brian Burrows]

Yes maybe you're right....cant help emotions running a bit high at the mo.....

I understand dude :hug:

 

[master baiter]

The only thing that I read tonight was banter.I seen no so called "Haters". There must be more to this story than meets the eye.

 

[fuzzyduck]

is it really worth even discussing this right now

 

[DR TOAST]

some one said befor to just take um out of chat . i like um but can see how they cors paranoia . even befor tonite thats wot i fort .

 

[clarkson]

I'm gonna have to say no.

 

[Witchywoo]

Tags, threads, posts, advice, people you meet - all the same, you can ignore them if you choose.

Exactly, they are just posts without usernames.

 

[Witchywoo]

not sure it will make a difference, I think tags played a small part in tonights proceedings. Who is to say the same thing would not have happened without them,

theres plenty of other ways to hurl abuse at someone.

we've been here before without tags so I don't think they are purely to blame.

 

[TomD]

I think perhaps there needs to be a certain amount of 'thick skin' required on forums, not a banning of tags so I vote they stay.

 

[RetroRules]

if any dodgy ones appear... maybe mods should say straight away there and then who sed if... if anyone asks them though

 

[Brian Burrows]

The only thing that I read tonight was banter.I seen no so called "Haters". There must be more to this story than meets the eye.

One man's 'banter' is another's 'hater', I guess?

I hope Danny's OK . . . peelo and I have spent half the night on the 'phone . . . we're drained (more than you might think) . . . I'm hoping things calm down enough on here

 

[Cherry]

The tags should stay, i dont think they are to blame.

 

[CheekyMonkey]

bin this thread too - its a Blugg thread

just lose the lot IMO